Winner of the 2017 Library Award for Undergraduate ResearchAn exploration of the role of the U.S.’s desire to democratize a post World War II Japan on motivating and influencing Americans to work as defense lawyers for Japanese class A war criminals during the International Military Tribunal for the Far East. The work focuses on primary source materials from some of the defense lawyers, which helps map and showcase their transition from Americans to lawyers to defenders of “the enemy.” It investigates how these American lawyers remedied their allegiance to their country and loyalty to their clients, with whom many developed genuine friendships
Reviewing Justice at War: The Story of the Japanese American Internment Cases, by Peter Irons (1983)
This thesis analyses the processes through which the United States sought to influence the political...
In the past, reforms in Japanese criminal procedure would have been of little interest to most Ameri...
Beginning in late 1945, the United States, Britain, China, Australia, France, the Netherlands, and l...
Between April 29, 1946 and November 12, 1948 the International Military Tribunal for the Far East c...
This dissertation explores the inner-workings of the International Military Tribunal for the Far Eas...
Thesis advisor: Franziska SeraphimThis dissertation locates post-occupation Japan and U.S.-occupied ...
Until comparatively recently (see, eg., The Other Nuremberg by Arnold C. Brackman, 1987) there has b...
Years after the prosecution of Nazi and Japanese war criminals, the United Nations created an Intern...
After the war in the Pacific formally ended in September 1945, the victorious Allies occupied Japan ...
This paper examines deficiencies in the trial of Japanese war criminals after World War Two. The jud...
As World War II drew to a close in Europe, the victorious Allies faced the question of what to do wi...
Daniels examines the changing reactions of the government and the public to the internment of Japane...
In this issue, one of the United States Counsel at the Tokyo War Crimes Trial examines the legal and...
East Asia\u27s war compensation litigation simultaneously unites diverse regional actors (lawyers, s...
Reviewing Justice at War: The Story of the Japanese American Internment Cases, by Peter Irons (1983)
This thesis analyses the processes through which the United States sought to influence the political...
In the past, reforms in Japanese criminal procedure would have been of little interest to most Ameri...
Beginning in late 1945, the United States, Britain, China, Australia, France, the Netherlands, and l...
Between April 29, 1946 and November 12, 1948 the International Military Tribunal for the Far East c...
This dissertation explores the inner-workings of the International Military Tribunal for the Far Eas...
Thesis advisor: Franziska SeraphimThis dissertation locates post-occupation Japan and U.S.-occupied ...
Until comparatively recently (see, eg., The Other Nuremberg by Arnold C. Brackman, 1987) there has b...
Years after the prosecution of Nazi and Japanese war criminals, the United Nations created an Intern...
After the war in the Pacific formally ended in September 1945, the victorious Allies occupied Japan ...
This paper examines deficiencies in the trial of Japanese war criminals after World War Two. The jud...
As World War II drew to a close in Europe, the victorious Allies faced the question of what to do wi...
Daniels examines the changing reactions of the government and the public to the internment of Japane...
In this issue, one of the United States Counsel at the Tokyo War Crimes Trial examines the legal and...
East Asia\u27s war compensation litigation simultaneously unites diverse regional actors (lawyers, s...
Reviewing Justice at War: The Story of the Japanese American Internment Cases, by Peter Irons (1983)
This thesis analyses the processes through which the United States sought to influence the political...
In the past, reforms in Japanese criminal procedure would have been of little interest to most Ameri...